Dem race is finally over.
Well the end is in sight for the dems, happily. Hillary has been on her best behavior recently, doing a whole lot more criticizing of McCain than Obama. She knows he's won, and for the first time in a long time is doing the party some real good. Amazingly, she seems to badly want the # 2 slot. The Clintons are savvy political animals and they think Obama will win. Being a sitting VP isn't the worlds worst place to run for President. Just ask President Gore. Oh wait....
First, a look back. I have been busier and not posting. Had I posted after Rev. Wright's more recent eruption, I would have predicted that it would measurably eat into Obama's support and favored Hill. I would probably have predicted that the supers would stop endorsing and play more a wait and see. And I would have been WRONG. Nothing has changed the view of dem primary voters since late February. Nothing. ALL the races have gone as the experts have predicted. Hill crushes in West Va and Kentucky? Check. Obama wins NC and Oregon? Check. And so on.
Anyway, Hill wants to be Vice. If you're there, something may turn up. Or she'd have to wait 8 years. She's a healthy 60, and would likely be more than up to it at 68 if she sets her mind to it.
Anyway, the race is done. And my (modest) fan club is clamoring for my views on who Obama will pick as VP.
First, he doesn't actually "pick" the VP nominee, the delegates at the convention do. Typically this is a formality. But there's been a lot of speculation recently about the Clintons lobbying Obama supers to promise to pick Hill as Vice. Now if I were a super that owed the Clintons a favor, and went against them and went with Obama and they called me again and asked me to jam Clinton down Obama's throat, that would be a very appealing request. I would almost certainly agree to do it. I could win back favor with the Clintons and the Clintonites without really pissing off anyone.
Having said that, I'll work from the bottom.
America has about 300 million people.
My 300 millionth choice for Vice is Dick Cheney.
My 300 millionth and first choice, just one person BEHIND Dick Cheney, is Hillary. I just want her and Bill to GO AWAY. Her campaign has enraged me. She has violated what SHOULD be the first rule of politics-- what I call the Frank Sinatra rule. Do it MY WAY! To thine own self be true. She didn't do it her way. As Andrew and I put it, "She did it Dick Morris' way-- triangulate, triangulate, triangulate -- and never get out in front of the people by suggesting a smart solution that isn't a consensus opinion." She pretended to be anti-free trade, she supported a gas tax holiday, she attacked Obama hard personally and pretended to have policy differences. Just what difficult truths did she tell the democratic party in this endlessly long and monumentally expensive race? That we need nuclear power to transition away from oil? That fighting for national health care will require just HUGE political battles with insurance companies? That it will cost MORE money to fix the broken military W is handing off? Not so much. (Though she did, to her great credit, sound a very hawkish tone on Iran).
As an added bonus, no extra charge, she and her darling hubby injected race wherever possible. "He's black, HE'S BLACK," they whispered, said, and once in a while screamed. Yes, Hillary, he is. Thanks for that.
Although I don't take back my view that she'd make the best president of the dem candidates, she ran, in my opinion, a largely dishonorable campaign. I just want her to go away. If we need to make her Senate Majority Leader for life as a nice consolation prize to get her to go away now, fine. God knows she's a big improvement over Harry Reid, who I suspect may lose his seat anyway in 2010 when he's up.
Politically, I think she does the ticket harm not good (though probably not much harm). I think having BOTH Clintons around will get in Obama's way, I think she repels some voters, does bring some others, and besides, Vice Presidential choices are badly overrated. Lastly, Obama's glaring weakness is in national security matters, and well-crafted images to the contrary, Hillary's experience here, while deeper than his (whose isn't?) is not real deep. She didn't serve in the military, hasn't held a military related position, and hasn't been a longtime national leader on national security issues, as McCain has, as Sam Nunn did once upon a time, as Joe Biden has.
I just don't want her around. My first choice, pending a detailed interview and background check, is Jim Webb, Senator VA. He fought in Vietnam, was Navy Secretary under REAGAN, switched parties a while back and won a Senate seat from Virginia as a democrat. His being from a swing state is a small plus (yes, Virginia is seriously in play with Obama as the nominee), but MUCH more important is that he's a straight shooter, funny, engaging, a populist streak, and is up to the job of Commander in Chief.
My second choice, *sigh* is Senator Joe Biden. Dull as dishwater except when he's funny, and I don't always agree, but a democratic leader on national security for 2 decades.
My 2 A choice is Bill Richardson. Good national security profile, but doesn't look the part (short, very chubby). Americans are ignorant, and base a lot of their views on images, and he doesn't LOOK the part. But he IS the part, though he can be more than a bit odd in what he says. Being hispanic is very nice as well. Hispanic voters have been left cold by Obama (there are often tensions between black and Hispanic politicians in big cities), and McCain is even better placed than Bush was to make a real run at them, because he has sensible views on immigration, which he held reasonably fast to despite enormous pressure to bend.
Ok, my REAL first choice, the potential game-changer, the way out of the box choice is Al Gore. Sure its pathetic to be Vice President AGAIN. But he's got the experience, he can help on security issues, he has the sex appeal of an Oscar AND a Nobel. Suffice to say he'd be a HUUUUGGEEEEE plus. I doubt seriously he'd accept the offer, but if I were Obama I'd sure as heck offer.
These are my HOPES. If I had to PREDICT, I would be at this point pretty surprised if HILLARY wasn't the V.P. nominee. She seems to really want it, she got a ton of votes in the primaries, and can make life absolutely miserable for Obama if she chooses to take her marbles and go home. If she's on the ticket, she and Bill will work hard for it. If she isn't they won't, and may even do it active harm. Not a pretty picture, but then the Clintons aren't pretty people. Happily, she'd make a useful Vice, and if something happened to Obama, she'd be instantly ready to step into the Big Chair.
The FHQ+ Electoral College Projection (10/30/24)
3 weeks ago
7 comments:
Good post Danny,
I didnt think Hillary would take VP, but as you explain it does make sense.
Do you think a Obama Clinton ticket could beat McCain?
Could a black man really win in the US??
Pat Buchanan for Pres.
Fred Thompson for VP
Ann Coulter for Sec. Defense
Sean Hannity for Sec State
Yessssssssssssssssssssssss
Larry, that's the $64,000 question-- can a black man really win the U.S. If he can, then Obama will. The nation is HUGELY ready to turn the page on Bush, and while McCain isn't Bush, he's uncomfortably close on the big things of Iraq, health care, and taxing and spending. He has flip flopped on the disasterous Bush tax cuts, a point which even the cautious and cowardly dems will pound and pound on. Is there enough latent racism to deny Obama a victory? There could be. But I doubt it. Even if racism is a REAL problem, that will likely drag Obama's vote down from 56 to 51. Which would still leave him swearing on a bible on January 20, 2009.
Danny,
Thanks for clarifying your views on Hilary v. Obama. I knew when the race began, you were pro-Hilary, but your comments lately seemed to be to the contrary. To clarify my view, Hilary was better prepared in some ways to do the job, but I think Obama would make the better "leader." And I feel like he's proven that with his campaign.
Next on the list, race. I'm not going to mince words, and hopefully this won't get me in trouble with anybody because it's not completely PC. Anyway, Obama is a black person. And he'll also have some troubles because his name is so Muslim-sounding. But one thing that could help him with whites is he is not as black in appearance. Let's face it, his mom is white, so he is lighter skinned, and you're all lying to yourselves if you don't think that makes a difference. A lighter skinned black man is less threatening to the white population than your dark straight out of Africa black man. Additionally, Obama is a well-spoken, well-educated, charismatic person. He goes against stereotype. And he'll never be confused with Jesse Jackson or the Rev. Al. All these qualities make him more palatable to white america. He's less threatening, thus more electable. Hmm, maybe I'll sign this post as anonymous, so I don't get yelled at for not being PC and injecting race.
Ok, as for VP. I agree with you almost completely. Hilary needs to go away, and I think she could hurt almost as much as she could help. But there have been a lot of articles recently about her facing an uncomfortable return to the sentate, where she is still fairly junior and has alienated many colleagues with her campaign. So she probably has the impetus to seek the VP slot, but not sure there are a lot of advantages to Obama picking her. I agree that Webb is an attractive candidate. Certainly takes the liberal edge off Obama for some. Richardson makes some sense, but his presidential campaign did not light any fires under anybody. I think we can write of Al. Biden would be a safe choice, but maybe a boring choice, one that won't inspire the masses. CNN has a good article and posited a few other candidates. Wes Clark was one I liked. I've heard a few people mention Sam Nunn.
BAM
I believe I shall vote Libertarian this year.
please vote libertarian. A vote for Libertarian is a vote for Obama.
Post a Comment